why do you want have more jurors if there is nothing to do for jurors. once there is a lot more cases then it makes sense to need more jurors. also this airdrop feels more bagging like a cool thing people want. (please come to my party there is free alcohol but kleros should not want to attract those kind of people) i think users need to get the vision first and then they want to support and follow. so before giving free incentives to users who don’t get the vision and need for a system like kleros, make sure to get the vision and mission out in a clear and simple way users can understand. who is your target group? economic students? law students? make more marketing at universities or wherever people interested in money tech society law are. also users interested seer and kleros are even more niche. so who are your target groups where and how you going to reach them? for whom can 60$ make a bigger difference perhaps students from developing countries but let them do a quiz first to qualify to become a juror. it should not be for everyone and obviously is not. exclusivity creates coolness i am proud to be part of it because i worked for it and deserve it should be more the thing
what you could do is making ai ahort videos about fictional cases in the feature which could happen like ai threats or robots or agents whatever and make scifi law shorts where you present an interesting scifi case and it ends with (how would you decide) and link to become a juror for the future society. they will see a page where they can take the kleros test and if they pass and create a poH they will receive pnk and if they pass another test they will get seer rewards but seer should be a different marketing video or you could do a short about futarchy or prediction market…