Jurors ruled in favor of the other party, not the challenger
It’s just the fact that the winning party did not supply enough ETH to have the privilege of getting a fair trial.
As highlighted in the initial post, there could be any number of contributing factors, not always related to justice, truth, fairness:
- 50/50 case (no guarantee of winning), no clear incentives for ETH whales to engage in a heated dispute on the internet
- Mark, professional troll and author of http://kleroscan.com/dispute/69 on holidays: Telegram: Contact @kleros
- A person who committed to fight has enough ETH in their account to fund further appeals
Everything is on the blockchain, here is the main contract: https://etherscan.io/address/0xebcf3bca271b26ae4b162ba560e243055af0e679
3 transactions that funded the appeal:
- https://etherscan.io/tx/0x1b447aa5552bc8bc9460d9cd7308609665c8c7888e12ec9fa9b043b4333bfc47
- https://etherscan.io/tx/0xff670342c615494296484076e01938d29873dad16be9edc4f68373ccd86b4d07
- https://etherscan.io/tx/0xda5c43db0ce58b57054435de83bc7f24455475883310fd48470a3e6fa54030b9
4 transactions that funded previous round:
- https://etherscan.io/tx/0x0d0c6ff89179da6f2c111260777364b8a71a4aec7f0e2fee6913b3c561457d6c
- https://etherscan.io/tx/0xdb03b09f985e3db18a37c9d946ed292c5c35435f58602ac5e573a14bf8a8178a
- https://etherscan.io/tx/0x177dc607c355f7c31ef6386d4a84fd78650fb22ab3c37904ba9d2d1827e189ee
- https://etherscan.io/tx/0x648a807518e421e2545cbaccaed7ee1ac910ebd428dd920cbc0a67a35dc8a090
In the current shape there are incentives for group of Kleros power users to come together and discuss behind closed doors and evaluate if there is money on the table:
(personally I did stay away as I have enough excitement in my real life)
Access to justice shoudl not be the privilege of a few.
To get majority of the votes and lose because someone else outspent you… F••k that shit, I want to become 1% as well: Plutocracy - Wikipedia