[Proposal] T2CR Primary Document Update

I see, old delisted migrated tokens can be OK for historical reasons.

I wish it was clearer. Maybe addition of “deprecated” badge?

Otherwise - as I said - it can be dangerous.

  • Kleros has some reputation.
  • TCR has some reputation.
  • Hundred thousand ETH worth of dollars.

Someone can have a look, see something, assume “yeah it’s legit”

That’s why adding old / migrated / scam / deprecated tokens is dangerous, unless we add badges to them.

I did not participate in the discussion earlier because I couldn’t care less

The 128px or 200px does not matter to me, the whole TCR is just an experiment in governance and creating loads of cases… I think it succeeded


EDIT / UPDATE: couldn’t care less about he exact wording. One way or another it’s an experiment in governance, decision making, reaching consensus.

I joined the discussion late. I genuinely think that tokens that are migrated are no longer cool. But yeah, historical reasons. To indicate that - need to add badge. Also a bounty to add badged. Bounty for removal: Bounty discussion - rewards for removing tokens? - #4 by clesaege

(stuff gets complicated)

(more important problems to solve)